Often, this incomprehension is due to failure by the writer to communicate convincing conclusions and novelty. They may be unable to experience a phenomenon or an event being described since they cannot comprehend the core message of the article. Readers will not be able to adequately understand the research findings. Poor writing flow weakens the unity and substance of a scientific article. 14 The writing shifts from one topic to another 12 and provides no evidence towards a valid conclusion. 14 Missing transitions create disjointed phrases or paragraphs with little sense of continuity. 12, 13 The sentences are fragmented, robotic, repetitive, or exaggerated, 6 with inconsistencies in tenses and use of language. It contains awkward phrasing and disjointed sentences which do not effectively lead to the next logical idea. Writing that lacks flow often has no logical argument or structure. To illustrate key points, examples from peer-reviewed scientific articles in the healthcare field are provided. 8, 11 This article aims to provide specific guidelines to help authors create and maintain logical flow when writing the text and main sections of a scientific article. 8, 9, 10 However, there is still a need for more journal articles detailing the sequential steps and providing published examples on how to achieve logical flow in scientific writing. There are numerous guidelines for writing a scientific article, often with specific instructions for developing a research question, performing a literature search, or designing a study protocol. 5, 6 Clear and logical writing efficiently disseminates quality primary data and its analyses. 3Ī well-written scientific article requires content proficiency and specialized writing skills to weave together terminology, language, facts, and ideas into a highly coherent information 4 devoid of repetitive language. Moreover, disorganized content diverts attention from the main aim or focus of scientific articles. Articles with disorganized content from unrelated text and shifting ideas are difficult to comprehend. 1, 2 Keeping track of ideas and writing in a clear and concise manner will benefit readers. Although it can be overwhelming for writers to maintain a clear and organized content, there are guidelines on how to achieve clarity and brevity in scientific articles. Logical flow in the main sections of a scientific article is achieved by presenting the whole story of the article sequentially in the introduction, methods, results, and discussion, focusing attention on the most important points in each section, and connecting all of these to the main purpose of the study.Ĭreating a logical flow in scientific articles can be developed and honed through practice and study. The use of transitions connects sentences and paragraphs, ensuring clarity and coherence when presenting academic arguments and conclusions. Logical flow in the text is created by using precise and concise words, composing clear sentences, and connecting well-structured paragraphs. Once completed, the draft outline is developed into a single, coherent article that logically explains the study. The first step is creating a draft outline of the whole article. This article provides guidelines for creating logical flow when writing the text and main sections of a scientific article. Logical flow is the key to achieving a smooth and orderly progression of ideas, sentences, paragraphs, and content towards a convincing conclusion. However, there are few guidelines on how to create logical flow when writing a scientific article. Many books and articles giving detailed instructions on how to develop a research question, perform a literature search, or design a study protocol are widely available. Numerous guidelines on how to write a scientific article have been published.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |